3/2/2011:
http://www.ago.alabama.gov/pdfopinions/2011-041.pdf


http://www.ago.alabama.gov/pdfopinions/2010-107.pdf

Copy and paste for info.

Are you aware that there is already a lawsuit pending with a hearing for class action scheduled for just after the legislature finishes it's session?
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA
GREEN LISA NIX, )
GREEN BRENT A, )
GREEN BLAKE, )
FRANKLIN ELDRIDGE M, )
FRANKLIN EASON L, )
FRANKLIN KIMBERLY H ET AL, )
Plaintiffs, )
)
V. ) Case No.: CV-2010-900013.00
)
KAY IVEY, )
RICKY JONES, )
JIM FOLSOM, JR., )
FREIDA HILL, )
GREGORY FITCH, )
GLENDA CURRY ET AL, )
Defendants. )
ORDER
This cause having come before the Court it is hereby, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that a Hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, April 27, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4A
of the Montgomery County Courthouse, Montgomery, AL.
All responses including, but not limited to, affidavits, briefs, or pleadings, shall be filed 7 days prior
to the hearing date in order to be considered.
DONE this 18th day of March, 2010.
/s HON. JOHNNY HARDWICK
CIRCUIT JUDGE
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
3/18/2010 10:02 AM
CV-2010-900013.00
CIRCUIT COURT OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA
MELISSA RITTENOUR, CLERK

Sheila wrote:

Please explain "unseverability clause" Is that good or bad for PACT families?
2 hours agoJami Gigis Wetzel I'm not sure what the unseverability clause means. Will you explain it when you have time?

Most bills have a "severability clause." It just means that if any portion is declared unconstitutional (invalid), that section ONLY is removed.  An "unseverability clause" would throw out the whole thing if any portion is unconstitutional.  For example, if the tuition cap is ruled unconstitutional, the whole bill / law would be thrown out, not just the tuition cap, and...there would go the funding...out with the bathwater (said sarcastically).

Rebecca Thrasher:
SB162 was passed 102-0 by the House -- now will go the house. Reps Craig Ford and Butch Taylor spoke to the Save Alabama PACT members on the front steps of the legislature. Rep. Ford reminded that we have not won the war - just a battle. We MUST CONTINUE TO WORK, WORK, WORK the SENATE - VISIT, CALL, EMAIL.
WE HAVE TO W...ORK HARDER THAN EVEN NOW -- Lets Start NOW! We will be in a conference committee -- we need to specifically be working Sen. Zeb Little, Sen. Smitherman, Sen. Barron and Sen. Bedford and Lt Gov Folsom - as they will be selecting the Conference Committee Members.
Encourage them to find a SOLUTION to PACT in the conference committee and LETS SAVE ALABAMA PACT - THIS IS ON THEIR SHOULDERS!See More
18 minutes ago Protem: I love how people who have yet to ever practice law a day in their life can walk in here and say they KNOW that it will be ruled unconstitutional. I have yet to this day to be able to say I know what a judge will rule. I have taught constitutional law and I am concerned that we can march up here and say that it... will be voted unconstituional without any explaination.See More
about an hour ago ·
IF I say that you I have opinion then that is an opinion 0 then that is my right to an opinion - if I say it is a pronouncement then that is different Mr. Ball
about an hour ago · Kenneth Barber how many do you think are there with you?
what kind of amendment did they attach?
about an hour ago
Rodgers: Confused -what does this clause do to the bill?
Ford: This clause allows an estimate $990M problem - to be solved with $236M.about an hour ago
Lindsay - We have two more years let the economy grow and this will be a gradual expenditure - this is bond endebtness is coming down and this where this funding is...
about an hour ago · Rodgers: I understand- we need the unseverability - as we can not allow this bil to cause an open ended cost expenditure of the ETF...we do not have those funds.
about an hour ago · Ford: I did not do what all I have done for you in the gallary to let you down!
about an hour ago
Ward: Everyone is going to start pointing fingers - my grip is we are playing political sheraids. I think we are going to pay a price down the road for this.about an hour ago
Love: If the bill passes as is right now -- and any part of it is declared unconstitutional - then the bill is dead - do we understand that.about an hour ago ·

Rebecca Thrasher SAVE Alabama PACT!: Make that Legislature back in session...
about an hour ago · appx: 1:56 pm

McLauglin discusses the ETF fund and the importance on the inseverability clause ...focusing on the future ETF dollars and its projected to have reduced costs already.
about an hour ago Ford - if we adopt this ammedment - the PACT program is back to the PACT board - and we will have refunds to parents, and we need a solution THIS session!
about an hour ago Voting...we want Aye - 57- ?? it passed.Cheering in the gallery
about an hour ago

Rebecca Thrasher SAVE Alabama PACT!: Committee is back in session...
McGlaughlin - Unseverability - Recommends that we keep the unseverability clause on the funding -- as without it - it could cause ETF to bankrupt in years to come - if the courts were to rule to remove the tuition cap from the bill.
about an hour ago (appx 1L54 pm)

Rebecca Thrasher SAVE Alabama PACT!: Updates have been posted -- we are currently being held up by a Joint Session of the House/Senate.

The unseverability clause was removed - by Hubbard of Auburn.
3 hours ago
Christa Norris Davis Thank you for the updates. I had to leave for another appointment.
3 hours agoGwen Braden Rebecca - doesn't that kill the funding?
3 hours agoShannon Robbins Dalton Will be checking in every so often...Thanks for the updates and for fighting for My child's education
3 hours agoPaul Mcfillin Please explain "unseverability clause" Is that good or bad for PACT families?
2 hours agoJami Gigis Wetzel I'm not sure what the unseverability clause means. Will you explain it when you have time?
20 minutes agoJami Gigis Wetzel Also, what is the ETF fund?
19 minutes ago

10:39 am Rebecca Thrasher :  Ford is at the mic.

Ford: We do not want to go back home and tell these students we will not guaranteee their PACT
4 hours ago · Ford: I suggest that we pass this on to the Senate and go to conference committee
4 hours ago · 102:2 to pass budget and address the bill..

4 hours ago · Discussion has started --Mike Ball: UAH prior issues -- thinks that if this passes it will be ruled unconstitutional
4 hours ago · Ball: asks that we take the unseverability clause out
4 hours ago · Mitchell - Mobile - Concerned with other fees that are mandated by universities
4 hours ago · Bridges - Chambers Co - Thanks Ford for his work - wants the families of PACT have not been treated correctly. We need to honor the contracts for these families. This will set a record between AL and its families. We need a resolution to this issue
4 hours ago · Rodgers: Talking about SB322 -- off subject...threating to argue for SB322. Is this filibuster?
4 hours ago · Shannon Robbins Dalton Thank you for the updates....praying and biting my nails
3 hours ago · Gipson- Autauga- Compliment them SAP for tenasity - great to work with - etc.
Has a PACT holder that purchased 18 pacts - these people are concerned, well aware, and I ask that we get this to a conference committee to diiscuss further.
3 hours ago · Rebecca Thrasher Protem-WE need these people to work with us Constitutional reform as well. This group of PACT holders has been great - well informed, well spoken, good to work with.
I hope we have groups like this for other bills!
3 hours ago · Wren: Discusses PACT board and need for better goverance on the PACT Board of the fund.
3 hours ago · Wren: HB123 & 124 -- discusses this as the formerly passes bills that are related to PACT. I would hope that we would not go forward with the future of PACT without some fundamental changes to the PACT BOARD.
3 hours ago · Wren: Hopes the HB123 & 124 would move out of the SEnate committee --to move forward.
We need a solution to assist in disapating and remidiating the legal action that is stacking up against the state.
3 hours ago · Ford: Asking the House members to encourage the Senate membership to bring HB123 and HB124 to the floor.
3 hours ago · Galliher: I think Craig Ford has made a common sense arguement to pass this bill today and allow the Senate to go to a conference committee to discuss.
3 hours ago · Unanimous vote to allow the changes from the Education Appropriation Committee.

3 hours ago · Hubbard: He is from an area with a college - Auburn Universitiy - this would be burden to the Universities budget. I think it is a problem that other students will have to pay for the other class of students. Why should other families have to voer the costs of those students... I do not want to kill your bill.I want it to be fair and with no poison bill.
3 hours ago · I think we need to add an ammendment - to take the caps off of the universities - I am not an enemy.
3 hours ago · Ford - requests a copy of the ammendment.
3 hours ago · In Ford's opinion -this ammendment would kill the PACT bill. Hubbard - the Senate would not never turn their backs on Higher Ed.
3 hours ago · 50-37 Hubbard's 1st ammendment (removing the caps) defeated!
3 hours ago · Hubbard - ammendment to change language to be severable - from unseverable. Remove "the poison pill"
3 hours ago · Hubbard - 41-47 - Motion fails...Ford takes the bill off the table.
3 hours ago · They are entering a joint session - will be held until after that session.
3 hours ago · Senate and House of Reps -- they are honoring WWII Veterans
3 hours ago · Report

What hasn't been included is the fact that many current students who have hours remaining on their contracts may NOT RECEIVE any refund since payouts are deducted before refunding any $!!!!

Emily had approximately 42 hours before Spring 2010 billing with a $0 refund available.  Sarah had, BEFORE Spring 2010 billing, a $7182.76 refund, but had 123 hours left! Alabama's summer 2010 tuition for 12 hours (3-4 classes) is $3900! That's less than 2 semesters in $. 

Anyone with a current student attending should call and check their refund balance versus tuition hours balance. I'm afraid many parents will be shocked.

Just to give you an example of with what we're dealing!!!

The Auburn Plainsman - Your View Building Naming Issue Continues to Rile Alumni
http://www.theplainsman.com/view/full_s … ile-Alumni

These are three questions which I would like answered:

1.  If the colleges are so concerned about discrimination in reference to different tuition rates, why are there instate and out-of-state tuition rates?

2.  If the state funds K5-12 with our taxes and students attend free (per se), and they also fund instate colleges, why can our children not attend college FREE?

3. Why is Mississippi considering changing to a single tuition rate for instate as well as out-of-state students because they are losing so many to other states, such as Alabama, with the "gift" the Alabama Legislature has given in the State Code (thereby controlling tuition costs in lieu of the college trustees doing so, which is one of their very verbal arguments against some of the proposals)?

Mississippi Senate measure looks at in-state tuition for all » Memphis Commercial Appeal Mobile

http://m.commercialappeal.com/news/2010 … re-waives/

Sheila

12

(6 replies, posted in General Comments Regarding PACT)

If ALDOT, as an entity of the State, has a road construction contract with, for example Dunn Construction, and Dunn completes that project per the contract stipulations, would the State be able to refuse to honor their contractual obligation of payments?

If Ivey's Treasurer's Department purchases supplies or office furniture, can they simply say they have squandered their money in bad investments, therefore they do not have the funding to pay?

Could the Treasurer's Department be held responsible for PACT out of THEIR budget for mismanagement since it was under their control?

We have three attending Alabama after taking classes at a community college. Our decision to purchase PACT was to have a stable base of tuition prepaid for them to help with the unsure expenses of room, board, transportation, etc. Since we knew that there would be neither profit nor loss to be realized by us under the PACT-only the fully paid tuition at the time needed- we could concentrate on those items which we assumed would be controlled by inflation and demand.

Failure to honor the contracts of PACT could be detrimental to any obligation assumed by the State. Should I have a business which contracts with any State entity, I would become very concerned as to whether the State would honor any contracts. I believe even bond insurers would be concerned about any contractual agreements. "Oh, I'm sorry. We just made some bad investments, so we'll have to reduce your payments.". I don't think so.

Also, what do you tell your student when they ask, "Does this mean I have to drop out of college?"

A student loan, part-time job, and parental assistance may be insufficient to cover current college costs when there is an approximate $7500 per year per student deficit which was unplanned, especially when the student is either attending or would shortly be attending college!!!

Yes, all three of our contracts were some of the original pre-1995 "guaranteed" clause contracts. If the State cannot honor PACT contracts, I would probably be in a majority of people who would begin to wonder just what other things the State would attempt to fail to honor.

Me, too. I've got 3 down there.

Arriving at the meeting late, I did not get the attendees names.versus the locations at which they were sitting. Could anyone identify the gentleman sitting on the 2nd row from the left closest to the audience? I was very dismayed at his proposal to reduce four year college tuition payment to the median tuition beginning this fall, or at the latest spring 2010 semester.

Mary said, "When this was getting discussed about PACT paying the average tuition-you were the one I was thinking about (won't you have 3 in college at one time?).  That's a lot of up-front money to come up with -even with parents giving in by getting the tax credit."

You're right, Mary.  I will have 3 at UA in the fall. 

If my figures are correct (and the rates stay close to my estimates), I would have to pay UA $2,384.85 in additional tuition above the PACT for the fall, 2009 PLUS other expenses.  Since their own 2009-10 estimate is $12,084 in additional expenses for the year per student, that would be $2384.85 + $18,126 = $20,510.85 for the rest of the year!  Who do they think we are??? Warren Buffett?

So, would I just stop having state tax cut out of my check and send it to the school??? I don't think they would allow this, and I do NOT agree with this.

My husband is retired, so his RSA payment has already been pre-taxed.  I think most teachers also paid state taxes on their state retirement prior to retiring, as well as many others who have retired.  This reduces the amount of state taxes owed so it wouldn't work unless we could get the whole amount paid to the school refunded if it was greater than the tax liability and withholdings.

If we purchased a tuition package, it should pay tuition, not some portion of it just because our kids choose to attend a state school which provides their major!  We are not choosing private school, but a STATE school.  I would HAVE to fight this.  It is entirely ridiculous!

I'm sure there are other people out there with students who had budgeted and planned for the tuition to be paid in full, and this would throw everything we had planned all those years into turmoil!

That's another 1 of those things that have somehow managed to get changed over time.  I really don't like this!

BamaPactMom said, "Does anyone know the number of PACT enrolles at those schools? I asked Ivey but have received NO response from her office."

From my post on 4/23/09:
"Approximately 10% of the students at Alabama and Auburn are on the PACT,
http://www.ache.state.al.us/Notes&N … olders.pdf

"About 63 percent of all PACT recipients attend Auburn or the University of Alabama's main campus in Tuscaloosa, according to the fund, making up 10 percent of each school's student body. Fitch said talks have focused on those schools."

Only 912 of the early contract beneficiaries are currently attending college.  How many later contract beneficiaries are currently attending?

http://m.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/ … ate=wapart

"Of the 6,292 who signed the "guaranteed payment" contract, 912 are currently in college, and 5,380 are not yet in college."

http://www.treasury.alabama.gov/pact/Do … 090316.pdf

There is no way that we can figure exactly how many have already graduated or used their benefits because they could be purchased through 9th grade, and the report doesn't show cancellations.  It appears there were appx. 75,999 purchased from 1990-2008 (feel free to correct my figures if my computer calculator keying is incorrect).  There were 50,017 active contracts per this report at the end of 2008.  If we use basic allocation, 912 currently enrolled of original 6292 "guaranteed" contracts, then there could be appx. 7250 students currently enrolled including the original contracts (912 / 6292 = x / 50,017).  Again, using their 63% rate above, 7250 * .63 = 4568 attending UA or AU.

http://oira.ua.edu/factbook/2007-2008/2007p002.pdf
UA 2007-2008 "FTE Enrollment: 23,898"

http://www.auburn.edu/admissions/auburn … ofile.html
Auburn "Fall 2008 Enrollment Data...
Total: 24,530
Undergraduates: 20,037"

Using the 10% statistic quoted above, 23,898 + 20,037 = 43,935, and 43,935 at 10% would be 4,394.  That would be pretty close to the 4,568 using the other method.

So, I guess we can assume between 4400 and 4550 or so are attending Alabama (not including UAB or UAH) or Auburn.  Note that the statistics do not clarify if they are only including Tuscaloosa or the other campuses.

dhpeacher said, "I was under the impression that my five PACTS provided both tuition and fees!  Has anyone else run into this?"

Mary said, "Fees are not paid by PACT (e.g., computer fees, lab fees, required application fees, etc).  When my son was thinking about going to a community college this summer, I called PACT and they said that there would be no problem with the "eight semesters of fees" being reduced too soon because UA does not receive fee money (we paid all of the fees).  SO, I don't know if that pre-arranged $6400/year between UA and PACT is supposed to cover "fees" also or not.  I know that we had to pay for every "fee" billed."

From my experience, having dealt with both community college fees and four-year university fees on my daughters, the community college fees are mostly covered, NON-inclusive of parking or certain computer fees.  Four year university fees are NOT covered. 

http://www.treasury.alabama.gov/pact/Do … ndbook.pdf

From page 4:
"Qualified fees are specifically listed by category, as follows: Building fee, Facility fee, Technology fee, Learning Resource Fee, Administrative Fee, Registration Fee, Instructional Fee, Library Fee, Bond Reserve Fee, and General University Fee. These are the only fees that will be paid by PACT."

Additionally, it does NOT cover room, board, Dining Dollars ($300 per semester if taking over 9 semester hours at AL-required), parking permit (UA=$175, last year, I think), $220-2009-10.  So, figure the only thing at a four-year university being paid by PACT would be the $3,520 according to their estimates for 09-10, leaving a balance of $6042 PER SEMESTER.  If they pay the 2008-09 average in-state rate of

http://cost.ua.edu/undergraduate-budget09-10.htm
Alabama Resident
Tuition Estimate1          $ 3,520.00
Course Fees2                $  250.00
Dining Dollars Account3 $  300.00
Meal Plan4                    $ 1,247.00
Residential Hall Room5  $ 3,475.00
Parking Decal6               $   220.00
Books and Supplies        $ 550.00

Totals7                            $ 9,562.00

ALSO, FYI-------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.treasury.alabama.gov/pact/Do … ndbook.pdf
Page 7
"Payment for out-of-state and private schools is based on this weighted-average tuition. The weighted-average rates change January 1 of each year.
Rate per semester hour: $181.67"

If they pay the 2008 average in-state rate of
$181.67 x 12-17 hours (AL's current full-time),
$2,180.04 to $3,088.39 per the proposal,
we would owe an additional $1,339.96 (12 hours) to $431.61 (17 hours) per semester.

Using 15 (average full-time hours):
PACT, under the proposal, would pay $2,725.05 of $3,520 or a shortage of $794.95 for tuition. 

Since most students average 15 hours per semester
1.  Figure up your state tax from your 2008 tax form,
2.  Multiply $794.95 x 2 semesters totalling $1,589.90 shortage on tuition (and, for personal budgeting, add the $12,084 in additional estimated costs),
3.  Multiply by number of students.
COMPARE!!!

I'm sorry, but THIS IS NOT THE TUITION PACT I BOUGHT!!!!!

The Senate is in adjournment until Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. SB581 is again on the agenda.

If I'm not mistaken, there are only 7 days left in this session.  That's 1 for Senate approval, 3 for House, 3 days extra. So, if it hasn't passed the Senate by the end of 4 session days, we're out of luck on passage for this session.  Any input as to whether I'm correct?

"The Senate is in adjournment until Tuesday, April 28, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. "

It is on the agenda for
"IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF
ALABAMA
REGULAR SESSION 2009
SENATE CALENDAR NO. 22
TWENTY-FOURTH LEGISLATIVE DAY
04/28/2009
________________________
REGULAR CALENDAR
________________________"

Also, for those who want to listen to Senate streaming (I've never listened online):
http://www.legislature.state.al.us/audi … audio.html

http://www.theplainsman.com/pages/full_ … open=&

"A bill to rescue the PACT program was given a second reading Thursday, April 17, before the Senate and is expected to receive a vote on Tuesday."

"The state education budget will be discussed in the Senate this week and further decisions will be made on this issue.

“The bill doesn’t say where the funding will come from, but that the legislature will fund it from whatever source is available,” Beale said. “The problem is K-12 doesn’t want it to come out of their funding. They want it to come from higher education funding, which was recently reduced. So, there is just no money available.”

4/23/09 - No cigar.  Not handled today.

Dave said, "Sheila-when do you anticipate a vote on SB581?"

I don't think there's really any way to tell.  They will get to it if and when they get to it.  The next day for Senate is Tuesday, 4/28, I think.  And, we don't need to forget that it requires two legislative bodies for passage.  Sorry, it took so long to answer.  I had to make a personal trip to Montgomery today. 

Here's a pretty good blog to follow the "goings on" in Montgomery:
http://alabama2009legislativesession.blogspot.com/

Stupid idea?  If the State agrees to fund the PACT 100% under SB581, does it really matter to us if they have a tuition freeze for PACT participants? Is Bronner the only one who has proposed this?  I know, actuarially, it would be easier to project with at least a few definites, but...  If they are funding ours at 100%, does removal of the freeze on PACT tuition affect us? 

Also, just doing a little figuring:
1.  Approximately 15% of UA's funding is from the State http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/m … amp;coll=2
"State appropriations - this year, close to $498 million - make up about 15 percent of the budget for the system's three campuses in Tuscaloosa, Birmingham and Huntsville. The full system budget was $4.3 billion this year, including the UAB Health System, according to system spokeswoman Kellee Reinhart."

2.  Approximately 10% of the students at Alabama and Auburn are on the PACT,
http://www.ache.state.al.us/Notes&N … olders.pdf
"About 63 percent of all PACT recipients attend Auburn or the University of Alabama's main campus in Tuscaloosa, according to the fund, making up 10 percent of each school's student body. Fitch said talks have focused on those schools."

3.  Only 912 of the early contract beneficiaries are currently attending college.  How many later contract beneficiaries are currently attending?
http://m.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/ … ate=wapart
"Of the 6,292 who signed the "guaranteed payment" contract, 912 are currently in college, and 5,380 are not yet in college."

Interesting concept, huh?

FYI From ALISON

IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF
ALABAMA
REGULAR SESSION 2009
SENATE CALENDAR NO. 21
TWENTY-THIRD LEGISLATIVE DAY
04/23/2009
________________________
REGULAR CALENDAR
________________________

By Senators Bedford and Holley (With Substitute):
SB581 Relating to the Alabama Prepaid Affordable College Tuition (PACT) Program; to amend Sections 16-33C-1, 16-33C-2.1, 16-33C-3, 16-33C-4, 16-33C-5, 16-33C-6, 16-33C-7, 16-33C-8, 16-33C-9, 16-33C-10, and 16-33C-13, Code of Alabama 1975, and to add Sections 16-33C-5.1 and 16-33C-6.1 to the Code of Alabama 1975, to transfer the administration of the PACT Program, including existing rights, contracts, and obligations, from the State Treasurer to the Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama; to suspend new enrollments in the program indefinitely and to ratify and confirm actions taken pursuant to the current suspension; to define the term tuition and qualified fees and specify the duties of the Board of Control regarding tuition and qualified fees; to authorize the State Treasurer for the ACES Trust
Fund and the Board of Control for the PACT Trust Fund to solicit and accept funds for the PACT Program from the State of Alabama, the Legislature, and any other available source of funds, public or private; to require the Governor include in the budget, and the Legislature to annually appropriate necessary funds, from any available funding source, to ensure that the PACT Program meets its obligations and maintains actuarial soundness for the life of the program; to provide upon dissolution that remaining funds be used to repay funding sources for advances to the program, rather than to the Alabama Commission on Higher Education for the establishment of a scholarship program; to provide upon dissolution of the ACES Program that remaining funds be deposited into the ACES Opportunity Enhancement Fund,
in lieu of being treated as abandoned property; to require each eligible educational institution to accept the total tuition and qualified fees paid for PACT beneficiaries as payment in full; to prohibit discriminatory practices by institutions; and to provide for implementation and monitoring by the Alabama Commission on Higher Education, upon the advice of the Board of Control.
Finance and Taxation General Fund
Number of amendments: 0
- 161 -
FISCAL NOTE
Senate Bill 581 as introduced:
(1) immediately transfers from the State Treasurer to the Teachers Retirement System (TRS) Board of Control all matters of any nature whatsoever pertaining to the administration of the Alabama Prepaid Affordable College Tuition (PACT) Program;
(2) provides that the Board of Control may, in addition to all other powers previously granted to the PACT Board, adjust the terms of existing PACT contracts in order to preserve the actuarial soundness of the PACT
Trust Fund;
(3) indefinitely suspends new enrollments in the PACT Program;
(4) requires, for the life of the PACT program, an annual appropriation from any source of funds to be requested by the Governor and made by the Legislature in amount that is certified by the TRS Board of Control to be actuarially necessary, with such appropriations to be repaid by excess PACT Program operating revenue;
(5) requires, from now until the end of the 2012 Fall Term, eligible institutions to accept as payment in full the amount of tuition and qualified fees paid by the PACT Program for the 2009 Spring Term, with the amount of such tuition and qualified fees thereafter determined by the TRS Board of Control based upon the investment performance of the PACT Trust Fund;
(6) provides that the Legislative Council and the Legislature can recommend or enforce penalties, including appropriation reductions and punitive payments, upon any eligible institution found by the Alabama Commission on Higher Education (ACHE) or the Examiners of Public Accounts to either be non-compliant with the tuition-related provisions of this bill or have engaged in discriminatory practices against a current or potential PACT beneficiary;
(7) provides that, upon dissolution, all PACT-related fund balances would be transferred (after all costs and liabilities are repaid) to the Education Trust Fund rather than to ACHE;
(8) provides that the Alabama College Education Savings (ACES) Program shall continue to operate under the oversight of the State Treasurer and the current ACES Board;
(9) provides that, upon dissolution, all ACES-related fund balances would be deposited into the ACES Opportunity Enhancement Fund rather than administered in accordance with the Alabama Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act; and
(10) appropriates to the State Treasurer, in both FY 2009 and FY 2010, any amounts necessary and available in both the ACES Administrative Fund and the ACES Opportunity Enhancement Fund.
As substituted and as amended by the Committee on Finance and Taxation General Fund:
(1) eliminates the requirement that the PACT Program repay from its excess reserves any funds provided to the program upon the recommendation of the Governor and appropriation by the Legislature;
- 162 -
(2) removes as one of the enumerated powers of the TRS Board of Control the ability to define the terms and conditions of PACT contracts;
(3) provides that ACHE shall issue tuition-related compliance reports annually rather than quarterly; and
(4) provides that no PACT contract in force as of the effective date of the act shall be altered or changed in any way, and all benefits, promises, and/or guarantees included in such contracts shall be paid, provided,
and/or honored in full.
____________________________
Roger Bedford, Chairperson
Finance and Taxation General Fund
_____________________________

Mary said, "what confused me was that UA got $3200 from PACT when he took 13 hours the first semester and $3200 when he took 15 hours the second semester. "

It was confusing to me for a while, too.  But, 12-17 hours was $3,200.00 for 2008-09.   2009-10 will probably be determined in June or July.  It was around that time last year.  My middle daughter's summer tuition (only the tuition portion) is $2368.00 for 8 hours, and another $220 in fees and required meals which PACT doesn't cover! This also doesn't include a room.

Also, from the website:  "University of Alabama requires first year students to participate in the Freshman Year Experience Meal Plans."
"First Year Meal Plans
Bama Unlimited - $1602 per semester*
Unlimited meals; please note that this does not include the required $300 Dining Dollars.
Bama Gold - $1440 per semester*
220 meals per semester; please note that this does not include the required $300 Dining Dollars.
Bama Silver - $1165 per semester*
160 meals per semester; please note that this does not include the required $300 Dining Dollars."

I don't think a lot of people are aware of the costs involved in attending (even in addition to PACT).  It can be really tough on the students and the parents.  Dorms are $4400 to $7900 per year, and sometimes, choices are not available.

A problem some students have with attending 2-year schools, is that certain majors are not "taught" at the nearest 2-year schools.  My oldest daughter transferred from a 2-year school, and she received a letter shortly after she transferred that they were no longer teaching her major there.  One of the girls in her incoming transfer class at Alabama had taken all her core classes at a 2-year in Montgomery, and was told at orientation (same major) that she now had 4 more years to go since their major classes were set as 8 consecutive semesters (fall and spring), and the major wasn't taught at the 2-year college!

Without PACT it will be difficult, if not impossible, since I will have 3 there at the same time beginning this fall.  That was a major reason for us to purchase the PACT.  It allowed us to spread out the tuition so we could concentrate on helping (with their help, also) to pay for the rooms, food, etc.  Now, this is throwing a curve into a plan that had been designed since the early 90's when we bought their PACTs.  Pay tuition? or, pay other expenses?  NOT BOTH! Then, multiply by 3 students at the same time!

I am hoping there will be a solution before this fall, or there will be some major problems and even more major lawsuits! 

I just can't understand why all the minds can't come up with a solution that is reasonable for everybody.

25

(4 replies, posted in General Comments Regarding PACT)

My answer:
If you go to a car dealership and make a deal to pre-purchase a vehicle with certain options, colors, etc., you expect them to give you an exact price.  If you pay that price, you expect to pick up the car on delivery at that price.  If the dealership raises the price after the car is delivered, changes the options, or tries to give you a different vehicle for the same price, you would be understandably upset.  You would expect the dealership to provide you the vehicle you ordered at the price you PREPAID. 

Since the original contracts contained language to "GUARANTEE" a certain number of credit hours at  a fixed, QUOTED price, those who purchased the original contracts are also understandably upset.  The original contracts were sold as "Prepaid College Tuition," not sold as a 529 investing in mutual funds at the direction of the investor.  They contained the seal of the State of Alabama, signatures of officers of the State, and other indications of Alabama.  The purchasers, not investors in 529's, were actually "purchasing" "prepaid" tuition.

If you had a contract with the State to furnish office supplies for a specified dollar amount, would you expect the State to pay after you delivered those supplies? Or, would you expect them to change the terms of the agreement to that which would benefit them the most?  Would it be proper for them to say to the store owner that the economy is bad and their investments lost money, so they can't pay the full amount?  Would the office supply store be "bailed out" by the State when they were only asking to be paid what was originally promised?

Since there was an original agreement to pay the tuition, a bailout is not an appropriate term to use in fulfilling a contract. 

Some of the students are already attending or planning to attend this fall under the program and had signed for leases and dorm leases for next year prior to even being notified that there was a problem.  Should the PACT guarantee broken leases since they would be their cause of a default if they don't pay the tuition which was used in the parent's and student's budgets including employment, student loans, scholarships, etc. when considering college attendance and costs? 

How many students will not even be able to attend or finish?  Do you really want to tell your children that Alabama can't keep promises and will not honor contracts?  How is that a bailout?  Besides, yes, the governor and the legislature did make the deals, otherwise there would be no laws establishing the program in the first place!