Topic: Publicity

I was interviewed by telephone today by The Montgomery Advertiser about how the PACT problem has impacted my family. I had written an editorial a few weeks ago in the Advertiser and they contacted me. Apparently this coming Sunday The Montgomery Advertiser is running a feature story on the PACT problem. They wanted a picture of me so I suggested they take my children (ONE currently a sophmore in college using PACT and my sophmore in High School who I hope will be able to use his PACT in 3 years). We will not be the ony family interviewed so I hope this article will be good publicity for how families (PACT contract holders) are dealing with the news (or lack of it) about how and if PACT will be fixed.

I mentioned the SAVE ALABAMA PACT website and all the meetings, letters and phone calls to legislatures and some of the responses I have gotten.
I hope this helps-I figure publicity can't hurt.

Amy Mallett

Re: Publicity

Headline in today's Huntsville Times:

http://www.al.com/news/huntsvilletimes/ … amp;coll=1

Re: Publicity

I just recently join this forum yesterday and I have to say it is a wealth of information. In recent weeks I have been getting updates on the PACT situation by doing a google search every day. Tonight I read the two most recent newspaper articles posted. Sen. Pittman was quoted with his comment about why should PACT holders benefit from the legislature working out a solution when other parent's investments for college for their students are suffering too.  The newspaper's website allowed for a blog type forum for comments. For both articles the most recent posted comment stated why should PACT holders get a "bailout" because investment value droppped in the PACT program. In my opinion we need to respond to these comments and explain that the PACT is a contract, not an investment in financial commodities, at least not for the PACT buyers. Those investments were the decision of the Treasury Dept. I posted comments to that effect to both articles. We have got to counter any comments which refer to this as a "bailout". Too many people have anger over any program or action labeled as a "bailout", and justifiably so. I encourage others to respond to these articles also.

Re: Publicity

My answer:
If you go to a car dealership and make a deal to pre-purchase a vehicle with certain options, colors, etc., you expect them to give you an exact price.  If you pay that price, you expect to pick up the car on delivery at that price.  If the dealership raises the price after the car is delivered, changes the options, or tries to give you a different vehicle for the same price, you would be understandably upset.  You would expect the dealership to provide you the vehicle you ordered at the price you PREPAID. 

Since the original contracts contained language to "GUARANTEE" a certain number of credit hours at  a fixed, QUOTED price, those who purchased the original contracts are also understandably upset.  The original contracts were sold as "Prepaid College Tuition," not sold as a 529 investing in mutual funds at the direction of the investor.  They contained the seal of the State of Alabama, signatures of officers of the State, and other indications of Alabama.  The purchasers, not investors in 529's, were actually "purchasing" "prepaid" tuition.

If you had a contract with the State to furnish office supplies for a specified dollar amount, would you expect the State to pay after you delivered those supplies? Or, would you expect them to change the terms of the agreement to that which would benefit them the most?  Would it be proper for them to say to the store owner that the economy is bad and their investments lost money, so they can't pay the full amount?  Would the office supply store be "bailed out" by the State when they were only asking to be paid what was originally promised?

Since there was an original agreement to pay the tuition, a bailout is not an appropriate term to use in fulfilling a contract. 

Some of the students are already attending or planning to attend this fall under the program and had signed for leases and dorm leases for next year prior to even being notified that there was a problem.  Should the PACT guarantee broken leases since they would be their cause of a default if they don't pay the tuition which was used in the parent's and student's budgets including employment, student loans, scholarships, etc. when considering college attendance and costs? 

How many students will not even be able to attend or finish?  Do you really want to tell your children that Alabama can't keep promises and will not honor contracts?  How is that a bailout?  Besides, yes, the governor and the legislature did make the deals, otherwise there would be no laws establishing the program in the first place!

Re: Publicity

We agree with you in your accessment! I take the time to post on the media blog with each of these articles we find...

Also mention for readers of the blogs to come to our site here and get the correct information...savealabamapact.com...please do the same!

Power is in numbers!

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.'