Topic: Why pave roads when funding legally binding obligations is in doubt?

I hate politics. And I detest politicians who talk out both sides of their mouths. Our legislators are setting up the future of PACT to be determined by whether or not our Universities will agree on capping tuitions, and trying to convince you, me, and the general public that this is the only way to fix PACT's legally binding debt.

Meanwhile, those same legislators are moving toward a vote on tapping the Alabama Trust Fund to pay for non-legally binding improvements to our roads. I'm all for fixing potholes, but why not pay off past promises before making any new ones!?! How come the same money that PACT has been told it couldn't "raid" is now there in abundance ($1B!) to pay for new ideas?

We can wear green shirts, mail postcards, and celebrate moral victories all we want, but at the end of the day the only thing that matters is whether or not PACT tuition is paid, and currently the only topic on the table for discussion includes a tuition cap that every University leader is opposed to. The conversation we should be having is to supplement the $235M that seems to already be available and uncontested for PACT with whatever else is necessary from the Trust Fund assuming tuition caps aren't acceptable, and then and only then use whatever is left from the $1B to fix our roads.

Otherwise, these roads will be paved by our kids who are working instead of going to school.

I don't want decisions on my kids' futures to be made by these people.

Re: Why pave roads when funding legally binding obligations is in doubt?

KB, you are correct, and the person that has championed that bill for roads is Lowell Barron, who has told Patti he will not let the House bill make it to the floor of the senate.  ( Mr. Barron is a former Auburn Trustee)

http://www.legislature.state.al.us/sena … sd008.html

Re: Why pave roads when funding legally binding obligations is in doubt?

Just to give you an example of with what we're dealing!!!

The Auburn Plainsman - Your View Building Naming Issue Continues to Rile Alumni
http://www.theplainsman.com/view/full_s … ile-Alumni

Re: Why pave roads when funding legally binding obligations is in doubt?

I know that Save Alabama PACT doesn't want to take a stand on how to fund PACT, and I know that I sound like a broken record saying "tap the Trust Fund", but dadgummit the money is there now and it may not be available later if it's used to pave roads.

After this legislative session ends, I don't want to hear any politician say "sorry but we tried". Try harder. A huge stone is still unturned.